SILVIEW.media

THE BROAD AND CLEAR VIEW with SILVIU COSTINESCU

recent posts

about

  • Essential Knowledge Forbidden by Big Tech: OXFORD JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES’ EDITOR’S CHOICE

    Essential Knowledge Forbidden by Big Tech: OXFORD JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES’ EDITOR’S CHOICE

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    One of the most important truths that are obfuscated by Pharmafia’s propaganda machine: not only vaccine safety is very poorly studied, but there has been done precisely 0 (zero) research on the cumulative and synergetic effect of all the shots in the various vaccine schedules enforced by governments around the world.
    Meaning that we know jack-shizzle about their combined effect.
    Here’s an example of how that plays out against vaccines and serial dupes.

    Serial Vaccination and the Antigenic Distance Hypothesis: Effects on Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness During A(H3N2) Epidemics in Canada, 2010–2011 to 2014–2015 

    Danuta M. Skowronski, Catharine Chambers, Gaston De Serres, Suzana Sabaiduc, Anne-Luise Winter, James A. Dickinson, Jonathan B. Gubbay, Kevin Fonseca, Steven J. Drews, Hugues Charest, Christine Martineau, Mel Krajden, Martin Petric, Nathalie Bastien, Yan Li, Derek J. SmithAuthor NotesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 215, Issue 7, 1 April 2017, Pages 1059–1099, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix074

    Published: 09 February 2017 Article history

    Abstract

    Background.

    The antigenic distance hypothesis (ADH) predicts that negative interference from prior season’s influenza vaccine (v1) on the current season’s vaccine (v2) protection may occur when the antigenic distance is small between v1 and v2 (v1 ≈ v2) but large between v1 and the current epidemic (e) strain (v1 ≠ e).Methods.

    Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H3N2) illness was estimated by test-negative design during 3 A(H3N2) epidemics (2010–2011, 2012–2013, 2014–2015) in Canada. Vaccine effectiveness was derived with covariate adjustment across v2 and/or v1 categories relative to no vaccine receipt among outpatients aged ≥9 years. Prior vaccination effects were interpreted within the ADH framework.Results.

    Prior vaccination effects varied significantly by season, consistent with the ADH. There was no interference by v1 in 2010–2011 when v1 ≠ v2 and v1 ≠ e, with comparable VE for v2 alone or v2 + v1: 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] = −51% to 71%) versus 34% (95% CI = −5% to 58%). Negative interference by v1 was suggested in 2012–2013 with nonsignificant reduction in VE when v1 ≈ v2 and v1 ≠ e: 49% (95% CI = −47% to 83%) versus 28% (95% CI = −12% to 54%). Negative effects of prior vaccination were pronounced and statistically significant in 2014–2015 when v1 ≡ v2 and v1 ≠ e: 65% (95% CI = 25% to 83%) versus −33% (95% CI = −78% to 1%).Conclusions.

    Effects of repeat influenza vaccination were consistent with the ADH and may have contributed to findings of low VE across recent A(H3N2) epidemics since 2010 in Canada.

    Read the body of the research on its site if you need, we’re jumping to the final discussion, with our emphasis added. It’s stuff that goes against the new terms and conditions set up by the sellout social media / Big Tech, who are cancelling the science that’s not fitting their narrative

    DISCUSSION

    Using databases of the Canadian SPSN, we explored the extent to which repeat vaccination effects may have contributed to suboptimal influenza vaccine performance during recent A(H3N2) epidemics in Canada. We interpret our findings within the framework of the ADH, comparing observed effects measured by the TND with predicted patterns based on the antigenic relatedness between prior season’s vaccine (v1), current season’s vaccine (v2), and the circulating epidemic strain (e). This is the first modern attempt to directly correlate AD metrics with epidemiological observations of v1 effects and their overall fit within the ADH paradigm since it was first formulated nearly 2 decades ago.

    Across the 3 A(H3N2) epidemics since 2010–2011 in Canada, no adjusted seasonal VE estimate exceeded 40%, even among mostly healthy, working-age adults. Each of these epidemics was associated with a vaccine-mismatched strain (v2≠e), although variation in VE was not obviously correlated with the AD (or match) between v2 and e. Adjusted VE was highest in 2010–2011 (40%; 95% CI = 9% to 60%), similar in 2012–2013 (31%; 95% CI = −4% to 55%), but dramatically lower in 2014–2015 (−12%; 95% CI = −47% to 15%) despite comparable v2–e ADs ranging 4–6. In the original report of the ADH, Smith et al also highlighted a lack of correlation between VE and the v2–e distance in first-time vaccines [15]. Because A(H3N2) epidemics are associated with the greatest influenza disease burden [21], understanding the agent–host factors that contribute to low VE is critical. Our findings suggest that prior vaccination may modify current VE and that this effect may vary by season according to the ADH. Given heterogeneity in the conditions of vaccine–virus relatedness, we should expect v1 effects on current season’s VE to vary by season. Pooling or averaging across seasons may enhance statistical power but at the risk of masking meaningful variation and insights to inform mechanisms and implications; further explorations of prior influenza vaccination effects should stratify results by season and subtype.

    During the 3 A(H3N2) epidemics presented here, observed v1 effects included no modification, as well as significant negative interference; we did not observe positive interference (ie, enhanced protection), also possible within the ADH framework but under specific conditions not found during epidemics included here [15]. In 2010–2011, when v1 and v2 were antigenically distinct (v1 ≠ v2), minimal or no interaction was expected or observed. Conversely, with closer but nonhomologous v1 and v2 relatedness in 2012–2013 (v1 ≈ v2), the expected pattern of negative interference was apparent, although, with limited sample size, effect modification was not statistically significant. As anticipated based on the ADH, the negative effects of prior vaccination on the current season’s VE were most pronounced and statistically significant in 2014–2015 with homologous v1 and v2 antigens (v1 ≡ v2) and antigenically distinct circulating epidemic virus relative to v1 (v1 ≠ e).

    Although antigenic drift has been widely emphasized to explain the historically low VE in 2014–2015, the AD between v2 and e was not estimated to be dramatically different from recent prior seasons [10, 11, 22–24]. Conversely, prior vaccination had marked effects, negating the otherwise moderate VE observed among v2-only recipients despite vaccine mismatch. A similar pattern of moderate VE among v2-only recipients, substantially reduced with receipt of the prior season’s homologous vaccine, was also reported for 2014–2015 in multicountry analysis from Europe [11] but not from the United States, where VE against A(H3N2) was negligible in all categories of current and prior vaccine recipients [23]. In the Canadian data, a dramatic increase in the distribution of influenza A(H3N2) cases reporting prior vaccination was observed in 2014–2015 whereas controls showed the expected trajectory of gradual increase, reflecting vaccine coverage trends in the general source population [25, 26]. In all seasons, vaccination status was based on patient self-report and practitioner documentation before either knew the patient’s case versus control status (ie, influenza test positivity result), minimizing differential recall bias and heightening the plausibility of the observation particular to cases in 2014–2015.

    In 2014–2015 in Canada, under the specific conditions of v0 ≈ v1 ≡ v2 ≠ e, serial vaccination was associated with a nearly 50% increased risk of medically attended A(H3N2) illness relative to participants who were consistently unvaccinated. Statistically significant increased risk (OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.17–2.90) of A(H3N2) illness in 2014–2015 was also reported from Italy, where vaccinated participants were also mostly repeat recipients [24]. The 2014–2015 epidemic is the first season in more than a decade of annual VE monitoring for which the Canadian SPSN reported vaccine-associated increased risk, and caution is warranted in its interpretation. However, increased risk was previously reported by multiple studies from Canada and elsewhere during the 2009 A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in association with prior receipt of mismatched 2008–2009 seasonal vaccine, replicated also in at least 1 randomized controlled study in ferrets [27–31]. Influenza vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) is a well-recognized phenomenon following heterologous challenge in vaccinated swine, most of whom recover [32]. Although animal experiments may not be directly relevant to human experience, elements of involved mechanistic pathways may overlap and inform biological plausibility.

    The ADH is a useful conceptualization but is not amenable to exact extrapolation [15]. The originally published simulations were based on AD between v2 and e set at 2 with variability explored around v1–v2 and v1–e. Sensitivity analyses explored effects of homologous vaccination ranging up to a v2–e distance of 3, but not greater. Emphasis was placed on the prior season’s vaccination; the effects of earlier or multiple prior virus or vaccine exposures were not considered. The ADH predicts relative, but not absolute, VE, and the possibility that serial vaccine receipt might be associated with increased risk under some conditions was not considered, although such signals may have already been evident in the studies by both Hoskins and Keitel under specific conditions of multiple repeat vaccinations and v1, v2, and e relatedness [3, 4] (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). The ADH is predicated on the HI assay, but variability in HI results by assay conditions must be acknowledged [16, 20]. For example, in 2 of 3 epidemics analyzed here (2010–2011, 2012–2013), Canada’s national influenza reference laboratory characterized all viruses as well-matched to the WHO-recommended v2 reference strain (AD < 3) [8, 9, 33, 34]. Those characterizations, however, were in relation to the cell-passaged v2 referent (whereas manufacturers use an egg-adapted reassortant), included varying animal-source erythrocytes, and did not include oseltamivir to address neuraminidase (NA)-mediated effects [8, 9]. We based our AD calculations on HI assays standardized for these conditions by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza (London) [19]. Even so, further variability in the mix of variants by setting, the representativeness of selected reference strains, and changes induced by laboratory passaging complicates AD derivation, interpretation, and generalization. Future evaluations and their extrapolation would benefit from the assembly of a standard and definitive library of HI characterizations and ADs between specific egg-passaged vaccine strains and circulating genetic variants each season. The incorporation of modern genomic, bioinformatic mapping and antibody landscape approaches could also improve resolution in the understanding of vaccine-virus relatedness and response [35, 36].

    Vaccine effects beyond those involving the HA1 (ie, HA2 or NA) and other agent-host immunological influences beyond (or complementary to) the ADH likely also play a role, including possible heterosubtypic effects of trivalent vaccine not otherwise considered. Original priming (eg, imprinting) and prominent recall (eg, back-boosting) responses to historic influenza exposures can shape hierarchical antibody responses, with either positive or negative implications [37–42]. Annually repeated vaccination, compared with less frequent infection exposures, may accelerate antibody refocusing toward prior versus evolved epitopes, with selection for cross-reactive but non-neutralizing memory responses [43]. In the context of preexisting antibody, immune complex formation and Fc-receptor activation can suppress B-cell response to subsequent influenza vaccine doses [44]. Antibody-dependent mechanisms may also suppress innate cytokine signaling pathways required for proinflammatory T-cell responses [45], and in children, annual repeat vaccination has been reported to hamper development of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell immunity [46]. Repeat vaccination may also select for T-cell responses that are antagonistic, such as preferential activation and/or recruitment of regulatory cells upon reexposure [47]. Such mechanisms may also modify risk in previous but not current vaccine recipients. Ultimately, the mechanisms to explain the potential negative effects of repeat vaccination remain unknown but are likely multifactorial, requiring a more complex systems approach to resolve [48].

    Random and systematic error, including residual confounding and behavioral differences, may also contribute to findings. Few A(H3N2) epidemics were analyzed here, and each season represented a unique set of specific vaccine–virus relatedness conditions. Sample size in our indicator-variable analyses was also limited. Additional seasons are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn about correlation with the ADH. Population-based immunization registries are not available in Canada for the study period, but self-report is considered an accurate predictor of influenza vaccination status, as demonstrated in US analyses relative to registry data for both current [49] and prior season’s vaccination status (Ed Belongia Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, personal communication), especially among adults who comprise the majority (86%) of our participants. We have the greatest confidence in VE estimates for repeatedly vaccinated relative to consistently unvaccinated participants, both in terms of reliable personal recall of vaccine history and also statistical certainty owing to sample size, but less confidence in smaller subsets of participants reporting more erratic vaccination behaviors. Change in vaccination habit may be correlated with influenza risk, a bias that has been raised previously in deriving VE estimates in elderly adults based on administrative datasets but also potentially relevant in assessing current/prior vaccination effects using an observational design [50]. First-time vaccinees may have been newly motivated to receive influenza vaccine because of recent acute respiratory illness, possibly due to influenza. In the context of recent prior infection, vaccine responses may be enhanced [51] and/or VE may be overestimated through confounding by more durable and cross-protective infection-induced immunity. We did not have data available on prior infection history, but the proportion of newly vaccinated individuals with that recent history would have to be substantial to meaningfully influence VE estimates. Prior vaccination may have conversely blocked opportunity to acquire infection-induced immunity (ie, infection-block hypothesis), leading to underestimation of VE in the recurrently vaccinated—an indirect mechanism for repeat vaccination effects originally favored by Hoskins but insufficient to fully explain observed effects of vaccine-associated increased risk [3, 27, 31].

    In summary, serial vaccination may have contributed to poor influenza vaccine performance during recent A(H3N2) epidemics in Canada. The ADH remains a useful framework for reconciling variability in repeat vaccination effects but requires update to incorporate recent epidemiological findings, modern and standardized laboratory approaches for monitoring vaccine–virus relatedness and response, and a broader understanding of immunological context and consequences. Integrated immuno-epidemiological evaluation across an extended horizon is needed to understand the spectrum of repeat vaccination effects and to determine whether annual influenza vaccination is likely to provide long-term advantage at the individual or population levels—a return to the question first posed by Hoskins 40 years ago [3].

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    Sometimes my memes are 3D. And you can own them. Or send them to someone.
    You can even eat some of them.
    CLICK HERE

  • Hilarious Reuters fact-check confirms everything it tries to debunk: Bacteria killed people in the 1918 pandemic, Fauci knew

    Hilarious Reuters fact-check confirms everything it tries to debunk: Bacteria killed people in the 1918 pandemic, Fauci knew

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    War is peace and truth is fake news in Covidiocray.
    I hear there are many more “fact-checks” on this, published by other presstitutes, that all seem copied from the same press-release or something…

    First off: a New Scientist short article, as old as 2008, in verbatim copy, to take the bacteria debate out of the way

    Bacteria were the real killers in 1918 flu pandemic

    HEALTH 4 August 2008

    By Ewen Callaway

    New Scientist Default Image
    (Image: US National Museum of Health and Medicine)

    Medical and scientific experts now agree that bacteria, not influenza viruses, were the greatest cause of death during the 1918 flu pandemic.

    Government efforts to gird for the next influenza pandemic – bird flu or otherwise – ought to take notice and stock up on antibiotics, says John Brundage, a medical microbiologist at the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center in Silver Spring, Maryland.

    Brundage’s team culled first-hand accounts, medical records and infection patterns from 1918 and 1919. Although a nasty strain of flu virus swept around the world, bacterial pneumonia that came on the heels of mostly mild cases of flu killed the majority of the 20 to 100 million victims of the so-called Spanish flu, they conclude.

    “We agree completely that bacterial pneumonia played a major role in the mortality of the 1918 pandemic,” says Anthony Fauci, director of National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease in Bethesda, Maryland, and author of another journal article out next month that comes to a similar conclusion.

    Double whammy

    That pneumonia causes most deaths in an influenza outbreak is well known. Late 19th century physicians recognised pneumonia as the cause of death of most flu victims. While doctors limited fatalities in other 20th-century outbreaks with antibiotics such as penicillin, which was discovered in 1928, but did not see use in patients until 1942.

    This is not to say that flu viruses do nothing, says Jonathan McCullers, an expert on influenza-bacteria co-infections at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

    McCullers’ research suggests that influenza kills cells in the respiratory tract, providing food and a home for invading bacteria. On top of this, an overstressed immune system makes it easier for the bacteria to get a foothold.

    However, the sheer carnage of 1918 caused many microbiologists to reconsider the role of bacteria, and some pointed their fingers firmly at the virus.

    ‘Unique event’

    When US government scientists resurrected the 1918 strain in 2005, the virus demolished cells grown in a Petri dish and felled mice by the dozen.

    “The 1918 pandemic is considered to be – and clearly is – something unique, and it’s widely understood to be the most lethal natural event that has occurred in recent human history,” Brundage says.

    But to reassess this conclusion, he and co-author Dennis Shanks, of the Australian Army Malaria Institute in Enoggera, Queensland, scoured literature and medical records from 1918 and 1919.

    The more they investigated, the more bacteria emerged as the true killers, an idea now supported by most influenza experts.

    For instance, had a super virus been responsible for most deaths, one might expect people to die fairly rapidly, or at least for most cases to follow a similar progression. However, Shanks and Brundage found that few people died within three days of showing symptoms, while most people lasted more than a week, some survived two – all hallmarks of pneumonia.

    Local bugs

    Military health records for barracks and battleships also painted a different picture. New recruits – men unlikely to have been exposed to resident bacteria – died in droves, while soldiers whose immune systems were accustomed to the local bugs survived.

    And most compelling, Brundage says, medical experts of the day identified pneumonia as the cause of most deaths.

    “The bottom line is we think the influenza virus itself was necessary – but not sufficient – to cause most of the deaths,” he says.

    As the world’s health experts prepare for the next influenza pandemic, many have looked to 1918 as a guide, planning for a deadly super-virus.

    The H5N1 bird flu strains jetting around the world seem to kill humans without the aid of bacteria, but those viruses aren’t fully adapted to humans, McCullers says. If H5N1 does adapt to humans, bacteria may play a larger role in deaths, he adds.

    “Everyone is focused exclusively on the virus, and that’s probably not the best idea,” he says.

    Antibiotics and vaccines against bacterial pneumonia could limit deaths in the next pandemic. And while an effective influenza vaccine should nip an outbreak in the bud, such a vaccine could take months to prepare and distribute.

    “The idea of stockpiling [bacterial] vaccines and antibiotics is under serious consideration,” says Fauci, who is on a US government taskforce to prepare for the next flu pandemic.

    At a recent summit on pandemic influenza, McCullers said health authorities were increasingly interested in the role bacteria might play, but there had been little action taken.

    “There’s no preparation yet. They are just starting to get to the recognition stage,” he says. “There’s this collective amnesia about 1918.”

    Journal reference: Emerging Infectious Disease (DOI: 10.3201/eid1408.071313)

    and this is the fun part where reuters confirms everything in a desperate and hilarious debunk attempt

    Ladies and gents, Facebook’s premium smear-machine aka “fact-checkers”, aka establishment’s mouth-pieces licensed to kill competition, aka world’s #1 news agency are back in the spotlight after another comical attempt against one of our reports.
    The scenario is similar: they make up straw-men and give them a naive beatdown with a lot of laughable BS show off. But this one is a legendary performance that needs to become a classic reference.

    I peed my pants a little from the first paragraph:

    What this means is that for a week, these useless nitwits ran the debunk without even getting the incriminated study right.
    Like how do they even breathe… ah, wait, they’re maskers…

    After a bunch of fillers, because they’re paid by word, they land their only point and argument:

    To claim the 1918-1919 flu pandemic deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia alone is inaccurate.

    Reuters

    I bolded “alone” because that’s how they attempt to “virus” the discussion.

    No one said “alone” before them and no one made the claim they are arguing.
    So no, they debunked a claim they themselves made up. Or did they?
    More so, in exactly the paragraph that precedes their argument, they 200% CONFIRMED the claim that went viral:

    https://twitter.com/GaianPrincess8/status/1317275105169264640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1317275105169264640%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fuk-factcheck-fauci-mask-pneumonia-1918-idUSKBN277200

    See anyone saying “alone”?

    Fauci makes it very clear in his description of the study that bacterial pneumonia was preceded by the influenza virus: “The weight of evidence we examined from both historical and modern analyses of the 1918 influenza pandemic favors a scenario in which viral damage followed by bacterial pneumonia led to the vast majority of deaths. In essence, the virus landed the first blow while bacteria delivered the knockout punch.” (here).

    Reuters

    That part bolded in Fauci’s quote is our claim, it proves the official narrative was BS for over a century and now we have Reuters to vouch for it. Thank you, Reuters, we couldn’t advance The Great Awakening so fast if you NPCs weren’t polar opposites to genius! 😉

    And guess what, they can’t even beat their own strawman, because the flu may have started something in 1918, but bacteria ALONE delivered the knockout punch. And there would be no knockouts is it wasn’t for knockout punches, ya kno…

    So, maybe to claim the 1918-1919 flu pandemic deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia alone is NOT that inaccurate. If someone breaks your legs and someone else takes advantage later to kill you, only the latter goes to jail for homicide. And, to be honest, I could use more evidence on the lethal contribution of that first viral blow.

    Children can debunk a Reuters debunk

    As for the mask connection, science has not definitively demonstrated the direct causal relationship between masks and the 1918 bacterial pneumonia pandemic, but, based on the knowledge available so far, masks are generally associated with higher bacterial risk, from candida to “maskne”. So don’t tell people to look elsewhere, if you find a better culprit, first write a paper and get the Nobel you deserve. Until then, we have all the reasons to point at masks as a very likely suspect and demand much more caution. No one has even attempted that paper in quite a while because no one’s been that dumb, but we can always hope that from Reuters.

    … BUT IF YOU’RE HERE MOST LIKELY YOU’RE NOT 😉

    By the way, call that “anecdotal” or whatever, but my home country, Romania, has been officially birthed through a series of very large mass gatherings with no masks and no distancing, precisely during the 1918 pandemic. And I have all the reasons to think that lack of masks is what kept them safe, the pandemic being hardly noticed locally, at the time.

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Project Veritas has just buried the RNA jabs and Facebook, here’s our eulogy

    Project Veritas has just buried the RNA jabs and Facebook, here’s our eulogy

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Our nano-grand-jury has settled: best scamdemic videos of 2021 so far, and for a while, are:

    YOUTUBE BANNED OUR VIDEO IN LIKE 30 MIN, BUT WE ALREADY HAVE IT ON ODYSEE / BITCHUTE / BRIGHTEON

    Seems like Youtube hurried to prove our point lmao

    UPDATE: WE’RE FIRING BACK AT YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP WITH THEIR WEAPONS, OUR STRATEGY AND BACK-UP CHANNEL. FOR THIS TO WORK, WE VERY MUCH NEED TO SEE SOME LOVE FOR THIS ARTICLE AND THE VIDEO BELOW, WHICH HAS TO BECOME POPULAR ON YOUTUBE, NOT ELSEWHERE, WE NEED TO SCORE ON THEIR FIELD IF WE ARE TO WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP! THANK YOU!

    THE PART 2 OF OUR EULOGY SURVIVED THE YOUTUBE SCIENCE SLAUGHTER

    Amen

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • How does Pharmafia find six months old babies for Covid jab experiments?

    How does Pharmafia find six months old babies for Covid jab experiments?

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Anyone who has any remnants of humanity inside has asked this question.
    One answer is no secret to anyone: poor countries. But that’s not always the case, and this is where it gets darker.

    The ethics of deliberately infecting volunteers with Covid-19 to test vaccines are a complicated issue only if you value something more than human life, which is actually common, but not the case here. So I’m not making a secret that everything I know and feel made me conclude long ago that most medical tests that occurred on humans were abominations permitted only by a massive lack of empathy / humanity and usually driven by financial incentives. Everything that followed after that was but a confirmation. Point being: I’m long over that debate, there is absolutely no essential difference between the Bayer labs in Auschwitz and the Pfizer Labs in London (or wherever).
    And I know a large slice of society, if not the majority, still has major moral, rational and ethical concerns about this, luckily, and it can’t be that easy to find these kids without leveraging finances on poorest people, and even then…
    Proof to that, Moderna has just publicly admitted it has big difficulties in finding 3000 kids, and I hope they never sort it out. So much so that They appealed to all their presstitutes to make a roll call for them.
    Funnily, only days after Moderna’s appeal, CBS lies that they were having “more than enough volunteers, so basically these two messages are now still being propagated simultaneously:
    “Last fall, the Clinical Research Institute sent out letters to pediatricians’ offices and posted on Facebook looking for volunteers in the 12-year-old to 17-year-old age group. Though the study will run for 13 months, the researchers have more than enough volunteers for this trial.” – CBS


    Since you can’t expect anyone involved to be honest and open about it, based on their past and present performance, and they’re not, where to find the answer? There’s about 50 vaccines being trialed right now, some are moving into babies as young as 6 months old, this IS urgent!
    If you need another reminder why, go to Forbes and read “The Hideous Truths of Testing Vaccines on Humans”, or watch the videos below.

    To get back to the headline question, remember wherever demand forms, a market forms and an industry develops.

    A 2017 report in Gizmodo, entitled “How a Company You’ve Never Heard of Sends you Letters about your Medical Condition,” quotes a company called Acurian saying it purchases “public information” and “lifestyle data” to find candidates.

    It does not access your doctor’s medical file. Here are some excerpts:

    In the summer of 2015, Alexandra Franco got a letter in the mail from a company she had never heard of called AcurianHealth. The letter, addressed to Franco personally, invited her to participate in a study of people with psoriasis, a condition that causes dry, itchy patches on the skin.

    Franco did not have psoriasis. But the year before, she remembered, she had searched for information about it online, when a friend was dealing with the condition. And a few months prior to getting the letter, she had also turned to the internet with a question about a skin fungus. It was the sort of browsing anyone might do, on the assumption it was private and anonymous.

    Now there was a letter, with her name and home address on it, targeting her as a potential skin-disease patient. Acurian is in the business of recruiting people to take part in clinical trials for drug companies. How had it identified her? She had done nothing that would publicly associate her with having a skin condition.

    When she Googled the company, she found lots of people who shared her bewilderment, complaining that they had been contacted by Acurian about their various medical conditions. Particularly troubling was a parent who said her young son had received a letter from Acurian accurately identifying his medical condition and soliciting him for a drug trial—the first piece of mail he’d had addressed to him besides birthday cards from family members.

    Acurian has attributed its uncanny insights to powerful guesswork, based on sophisticated analysis of public information and “lifestyle data” purchased from data brokers. What may appear intrusive, by the company’s account, is merely testimony to the power of patterns revealed by big data.

    “We are now at a point where, based on your credit-card history, and whether you drive an American automobile and several other lifestyle factors, we can get a very, very close bead on whether or not you have the disease state we’re looking at,” Acurian’s senior vice president of operations told the Wall Street Journal in 2013.

    Yet there’s some medical information that Acurian doesn’t have to guess about: The company pays Walgreens, which uses a privacy exemption for research, to send recruitment letters to its pharmacy customers on Acurian’s behalf, based on the medications they’re using. Under this arrangement, Acurian notes that it doesn’t access the medical information directly; the customers’ identities remain private until they respond to the invitations.

    And that is not the entire story. An investigation by the Special Projects Desk has found that Acurian may also be pursuing people’s medical information more directly, using the services of a startup that advertises its ability to unmask anonymous website visitors. This could allow it harvest the identities of people seeking information about particular conditions online, before they’ve consented to anything.

    A letter sent out to a Walgreens customer in Connecticut on Acurian’s behalf. It invited her to visit a generic sounding website for people with pulmonary disease. At the time, she had a prescription from Walgreens for asthma.
    A letter sent out to a Walgreens customer in Connecticut on Acurian’s behalf. It invited her to visit a generic sounding website for people with pulmonary disease. At the time, she had a prescription from Walgreens for asthma.

    If you’re suddenly thinking back on all of the things you’ve browsed for online in your life and feeling horrified, you’re not alone.

    AcurianHealth has created dozens and dozens of generic sounding websites for the trials they’re recruiting for: www.trialforCOPD.com, www.studiesforyourarthritis.com, and www.kidsdepressionstudy.com are a few examples of the many websites they own. The sites all feature stock images of people in distress, sometimes include AcurianHealth’s logo, and include promises of up to $1,000 for participating, depending on the study.

    An example of one of the Acurian sites, www.sleepapneastudies.com
    An example of one of the Acurian sites, http://www.sleepapneastudies.com

    Out of view, some of these sites include something else: code from a company called NaviStone—which bills itself as a specialist in matching “anonymous website visitors to postal names and addresses.” So if a person is curious about one of those letters from Walgreens, or follows one of Acurian’s online ads, and visits one of Acurian’s generic disease-specific sites, their identity could be discovered and associated with the relevant condition.

    NaviStone says it can send personalized mail to anonymous website visitors with a day or two of their visit.
    NaviStone says it can send personalized mail to anonymous website visitors with a day or two of their visit.

    This tracking function undermines what’s supposedly a formal separation between Walgreens customer data and Acurian’s recruitment. If Walgreens sends out a bunch of letters to customers taking certain medications, and those customers then visit the generic website controlled by Acurian provided in the letter, Acurian can infer its wave of new visitors are taking those medications—and, if NaviStone delivers on its promise to identify visitors, Acurian can see who they are.

    Walgreens gives itself permission to use customers’ health information for “research” purposes, which would include clinical trials, in its privacy policy. It’s been working with Acurian since at least 2013, and in 2015, Walgreens announced it was “leveraging” its 100 million customer database to recruit patients directly for five major drug companies.

    When asked about its partnership with Acurian, Walgreens spokesperson Scott Goldberg pointed me to a Walgreens FAQ page about clinical trials. It states that Walgreens doesn’t share health information with third parties without permission, but that a third party may “receive your information if you contact the web-site and/or toll-free number in the letter to seek more information about the clinical trial.”

    The question is whether users will know that one of Acurian’s websites has received their information—even if they haven’t necessarily agreed to submit it. NaviStone, an Ohio-based business spun out from the marketing firm CohereOne last year, claims to be able to identify between 60 and 70 percent of anonymous visitors to the websites that use its services.

    When we contacted the firm last month to ask how it does this, Allen Abbott, NaviStone’s chief operating officer, said by phone that talking about how its technology works is “problematic.”

    “A lot of our competitors would love to know how we made it work,” Abbott said. “We have an advantage that we would be silly to reveal.”

    We asked whether the company had thought about the privacy implications involved in identifying people visiting a website for sensitive reasons, and whether there were certain customers the company wouldn’t work with.

    “Our business is almost entirely e-commerce, helping retailers sell to their customers,” he said. “There was one site that came into our radar that was adult-related material that we decided not to pursue.”

    We then described what Acurian does.

    “We don’t work with anyone like that,” he said.

    We explained that the call was because we’d found NaviStone’s code on AcurianHealth sites.

    “It’s possible,” he then said. “We have a lot of customers.”

    But Abbott insisted that NaviStone had found a “privacy compliant way” to identify anonymous website visitors—again saying he couldn’t describe it because it was a proprietary technology.

    When we analyzed the NaviStone code on Acurian’s sites, we found one way that NaviStone’s technology works: It collects information as soon as it is entered into the text boxes on forms, before the person actually agrees to submit it. When we typed a test email address in the “Join Us” page on Acurian’s site, it was immediately captured and sent to the company’s servers, even if we later chose to close the page without hitting the “Send” button on the form.

    In fact, the information was collected before we got to the part of the form that said, “Your privacy is important to us. By selecting this box, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree that we contact you by phone using automated technology or other means using the information you provided above regarding research studies.” – Gizmodo

    But that was long ago in terms of technological progress.

    However, the methods persist in 2021, an US local tv station reveals that exactly the same scenario occurred in Cincinnati, with the same company at the center of the scandal. Here’s what they’ve just published:

    <<Nancy Brashear opened her mail at her Campbell County, Kentucky, home to find an offer to earn money if she joined a COVID-19 vaccine test.

    “I got a letter from Acurian Health looking for volunteers for a COVID vaccine study, promising up to $1,200 if you participate or volunteer,” she said.

    It looked promising, but Brashear said she started to wonder how they knew she would be a good candidate for a vaccine trial. Did someone with a hospital, doctor’s office or pharmacy sell her health information?

    “How do they get my information?” Brashear said. “That really bothers me.”

    We called and emailed Acurian Health to find out how they got her name, but did not hear back.

    Company is a data firm, not a testing center

    Acurian is a legitimate company, according to the Better Business Bureau, and states it is a data firm that connects people with medical trials.

    It does not do the actual testing.

    “Where did they get this information?” Brashear asked. “HIPPA laws make your history private.”

    …

    The Protect Patients Blog has an in-depth article of how Acurian learns if you are a good candidate for a medical trial.

    But Brashear found that if you decide to apply, you will then have to give much more medical information to see if you actually qualify. There is no guarantee you will be accepted for a trial, and no guarantee you will earn anything close to $1,200.

    “If you go on the website, you have to go through steps to do that, so they are looking for information,” she said.

    In the end, she said thanks, but no thanks, wondering if she would be sharing too much medical and personal information with a company she knew little about.

    If you want to sign up for a COVID-19 trial, the NIH, National Institutes of Health, is a government site that lists all the authorized vaccine trials going on.

    Many of them will pay money, typically a few hundred dollars. However, they may not cover treatment for any side effects.

    So be sure to read all the fine print, so you don’t waste your money.>> – WCPO

    Also let’s recall our October 2020 article: CONTACT-TRACING DATA HARVESTED FROM PUBS AND RESTAURANTS BEING SOLD ON

    I don’t know about you, but what I’ve learned so far is:

    1. Pharmafia still does whatever it takes to get what it wants, even primitive hacking as described above.
    2. These methods are still too primitive for the biggest actors in Pharmafia who are well into artificial intelligence and cutting edge technologies

    So what are these top cats doing then?
    I’ve consulted some of my insider sources, put it together with my own digs and, as per usual with these creatures, the most obvious suspicions are also true.

    If you’ve been around, you should be aware by now of three tendencies that are one, actually:


    1. Big Tech and Big Pharma are merging

    2. Healthcare and Big Data are merging

    They’re not only after health data, don’t worry, all data helps a sale


    3. The above are merging with media and the elected government

    What are Google and Facebook selling, in fact?
    Your data.
    What for?
    So you can be best manipulated by different interests, with custom-design ads and policies.

    Oracle’s National Electronic Health Records Cloud dates back to the beginnings of the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, a couple of weeks after letting President Trump use his estate near Palm Springs for a $100,000-a-plate golfing fundraiser, Ellison placed a call to the White House. According to a Forbes cover story on Ellison, he “asked Trump if a clearinghouse existed for real-time data about treatment efficacies and outcomes.”

    Within a week after the president asked “how much?” and Ellison said, “for free,” the tech titan had brought together a team of Oracle engineers “to build a database and website registering coronavirus cases” and work with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies.

    The first public acknowledgment of Oracle’s progress came on July 3, 2020, when the NIH’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), overseen by Dr. Anthony Fauci, launched the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network (COVPN), aimed at enrolling thousands of volunteers in large-scale trials for a variety of investigational vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.

    Fauci achieved this by merging four existing networks, all researching HIV/AIDS, something they would continue to do. “The network is expected to operate more than 100 clinical trial sites across the United States and internationally,” according to the NIAID press release which also stated “the COVPN website features a customized data collection platform, which Oracle (Redwood Shores, CA) built and donated, to securely identify potential trial participants.”

    In August, a paper published by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security proposed that the “passive reporting” systems managed by the CDC and FDA ought to be revamped to forge “an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [COVID-19] vaccine recipients — perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.”

    By September, Operation Warp Speed director Moncef Slaoui was telling the periodical Science: “We’re working super hard on a very active pharmacovigilance system, to make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we’ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.

    In October, Slaoui told the New York Times: “The FDA is proposing that at least 50% of the individuals in the study population have at least two months of follow-up on safety before the vaccines are approved. And secondly, we are working really hard with the FDA and the CDC to make sure we have a very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system to allow us to continue to assess the safety of the vaccines as they are being used in the high risk population.”

    And the Wall Street Journal reported in a profile of Slaoui that he’d said “tracking systems will have to be ‘incredibly precise’ to ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects. Operation Warp Speed has selected the medical-distribution company McKesson and cloud operators Google and Oracle to collect and track vaccine data.”

    “This marked the first time that Oracle’s role was revealed to have expanded to include Operation Warp Speed.

    Oracle Chairman Ellison’s lucrative government arrangements trace back to the data software pioneer’s origins. In 1975, then in his early thirties, Ellison worked on a project for the electronics company Ampex in the Bay area, building a large terabit memory system for the CIA.

    Ellison revealed in 2014 that the CIA not only became his firm’s first customer for a “relational database” two years later, but that he adopted the name from a CIA project called Oracle. “The news about our hot little database traveled around the intelligence community pretty quickly,” Ellison was quoted as saying in the 2003 book, “Softwar.” “In a little over six months’ time we had won several deals — the CIA, Navy Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence and the NSA [National Security Agency].” – Technocracy News

    From this industry’s perspective, you enrolling KFC’s Fidelity Club or a vaccine trial is the same technical challenge. One that they keep winning lately.

    Remember when the sister of YouTube’s CEO and former wife of Google’s founder Sergey Brin, still a business partner, set up a DNA testing company and then sold the data for $300 million to pharma giant genocidal company GSK?

    Source

    Oh, it’s all about science and health, sure, but what science and whose health?
    Because anyone who’s been in touch with reality lately knows a few more things:
    – Pharmafia invests much more in the science of marketing than in medical sciences
    – That data often comes from marketing experts such as Google and Facebook
    – Marketing and propaganda sell and persuade much more efficiently than science when it comes to large masses of people. Or all of them. It’s way easier and cheaper to manipulate the low-IQ majority than to heal it. Especially with these tools Big Tech brought aboard.

    What keeps them from finding and manipulating the feeble minds they need for these new atrocities they call “vaccines human trials” and, in fact, are neither vaccines or human, just deranged human abuse experimentation?
    From what I’ve found out so far, the answer is: nothing.
    Everything you type on your computer is collected and can be processed to obtain a method to target and determine people to subject their kids to this. It’s probably much easier to sell than some of their other products. This is already a massive industry that often breaks ethical and even legal barriers.

    Source: The Guardian


    What, you’ve never thought Cambridge Analytica can work for Pharmafia too?
    Well then remember we’ve passed that, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft (recording my typing right now) and Alphabet (Google) are not distinguishable from Pharmafia at all. The concept that they wouldn’t take any and all advantage of their new powers and domination is comically delirious.
    Moderna must be running out of money or love if Google won’t send them a mere 3000 kids, no joke.

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Let’s take everything from the #WEF members and study their happiness #TheGreatReset done right

    Let’s take everything from the #WEF members and study their happiness #TheGreatReset done right

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    I mean it. Here’s how:

    Internalize the realization that the longer this crisis goes, the shorter and unhappier our lives will be and most people are already on the edge, many crossed the edge already. We needed to push yesterday, but ok, we didn’t and we’re here now, let’s do it now!

    CLICK HERE to find the list of World Economic Forum members.

    You will find all Western covid vaccines manufacturers on the market right now.

    Defund, deride and dismantle these genocidal cartels by any means available. There’s plenty of efficient legal means to sink them, no need to get the establishment’s hoodlums on your back by pushing the law.

    You can cancel many of them simply by voting with your dollars and your (lack of) positive attention.
    Yeah, nothing more revolutionary than doing things right out of your own conscience!

    Spread this message / video, download, reupload, make your own, it doesn’t matter.

    Wherever you see these dipshits on internet, downvote them, block them, and drop them the headline of this article in a comment.
    Attention! Don’t use other hashtags that can be censored, blacking out all our effort in bulk, these hashtags are theirs, they are secure and the best vehicle for the message.
    On platforms like Facebook and Youtube most comments containing un-friendly links are censored, so there maybe it works better without a link, maybe you can upload the cover photo or the video instead.

    Teach others the power and the utmost importance of this boycott, while we can still choose what we do with our resources and attention! It’s one of our last and most powerful weapons.

    CAN YOU AFFORD ANY MORE OF THIS?

    If I get any more good ideas along this line, I’ll update this article. For now I’m ruminating on a Logo / T-Shirt design for this, suggestions welcome on my socials, see the links tab in the upper menu of this website, thank you!

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Still Denying the Rothschilds Are Behind The Great Reset? Stop, It’s Getting Ridiculous

    Still Denying the Rothschilds Are Behind The Great Reset? Stop, It’s Getting Ridiculous

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Many people have problems or fall lazy following their money trail.
    Maybe they can at least follow their loud and clear words.

    “Stakeholder Capitalism”, one of Klaus Schwab’s many buzzwords, is what expects us at the end of The Great Reset or The Fourth Industrial Revolution, according to its main ideologists.

    It’s that stage where “you own nothing and you are happy” or you are on government’s kill list.

    If the line between communism and fascism appears blurred many times, it’s because it is. And Stakeholder Capitalism totally erases it.

    And who’s going to be at the top of the pyramid of the new centralized global system pushed by the social parasites from the World Economic Forum?

    Any road I take, it takes me same place.

    Also read:

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • MIND=BLOWN! Rapper Pitbull woke AF, discusses OUR REPORTS, Event201, Communism. Elites lost info war

    MIND=BLOWN! Rapper Pitbull woke AF, discusses OUR REPORTS, Event201, Communism. Elites lost info war

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Now THESE are words I never imagined I would ever write.
    And these are the times…

    So I am here to praise rapper Pitbull.
    Not only for wokeness and having the balls to drop truth bombs, not only for being informed…

    But mainly because he struck a major chord, with his plead for freedom.
    You see, I am too born and raised in the communist gulag, my Romania and his Cuba were very much alike back then, 30+ years ago…
    So after seeing this, I REALLY REALLY WANT TO GIVE A HUG TO THIS MAN, you know, make it physical.
    I also feel bad, I lumped him with the Cardi B’s of this world, and that’s his fault for making money with all these sell outs. But then again, if he keeps dropping truth from that height, it’s all better than good.
    So watch this and please please spread it around, it has the potential to drive more awareness in the masses! Let’s end this shit!

    PS: The part where he says Fidel Castro must be dead jealous on Klaus Schwab… 💥💥💥

    Watch the whole show and tell them Silview sent you over, for the woke part (it’s over 2h long) 😉

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • This new Time Magazine bomb ties our reports into the Unified Theory of the 2020’s

    This new Time Magazine bomb ties our reports into the Unified Theory of the 2020’s

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    The experience of joining the dots is yours to make, I can only give you a trailer.

    Remember:

    “You can defraud the purpose and spirit of an election without necessarily defrauding the law.”

    Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Most popular post on Times of Israel in 2012 has been deleted. From THEIR site ;)

    Most popular post on Times of Israel in 2012 has been deleted. From THEIR site ;)

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    We can’t allow another book-burning

    THE TIMES OF ISRAEL  > OPS & BLOGS  > Manny Friedman

    Jews DO control the media

    JULY 1, 2012, 11:05 AM

    We Jews are a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.

    We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which  was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do.

    But the funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!”

    Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

    Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

    Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?

    In his spare time as Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell was a media mogul and spy for Israel
    Read more

    But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

    And let’s not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite’s favorite punching bag. We’re talking an organization that’s practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I’ll never forget when I was involved in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense.

    Now, I know what everyone will say. That everyone tries to lobby. Every minority group and every majority group. That every group has some successful actors and directors. But that’s a far call from saying that we run Hollywood and Madison Avenue. That the Mel Gibsons of the world are right in saying we’re deliberately using our power to take over the world. That we’ve got some crazy conspiracy going down.

    Okay. Fine. So some of that is kooky talk.

    But let’s look at it a bit deeper.

    Maybe it’s true: everyone lobbies. Maybe it’s true there are actors of every ethnicity out there. But come on. We’re the ones who are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can’t we admit that we’re incredibly successful? Can’t we say it to the world?

    I’ll give my theory for why Jews don’t want to talk about their control of the media.

    First of all, as much as Jews like to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that it has to do with they’re being Jewish. Maybe they’ll admit that it has something to do with the Jewish experience. But how many Jews will admit that there is something inherently a part of every single one of them that helps them to accomplish amazing things?

    The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, was interviewed in a great article about the subject and he said that he “would prefer people say that many executives in the industry ‘happen to be Jewish.’” This just about sums up the party line.

    The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world. We’re talking about a group of people that just got put in death camps, endured pogroms, their whole families decimated. And then they came to America, the one place that ever really let them have as much power as they wanted, and suddenly they’re taking over. Please don’t tell me that any other group in the world has ever done that. Only the Jews. And we’ve done it before. That’s why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the Torah — it’s right there. And we did it in Germany too.

    This ability to succeed, this inner drive, comes not from the years of education or any other sort of conditional factors, but because of the inner spark within each Jew.

    Now, the reason groups like the ADL and AIPAC hate admitting this is because, first of all, they are secular organizations. Their whole agenda is to prove that every Jew is the same as every other person in the world. I cannot imagine a more outlandish agenda. No, we’re different. We’re special.

    And clearly, that whole thing about big Jewish noses was totally blown out of proportion.

    Of course, people hate when anyone says this. They assume that if you’re saying that Jews are special, it somehow implies that they’re better.

    To be honest, I’m not really sure what the word “better” even means. What I do know is that being special simply means a person has a responsibility to do good.

    I think that’s the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there’s something inherently powerful and good about them. Not because they’re afraid of being special. But because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world. It means that things can’t just be created for the sake of amusement or fun or even “art.”

    Suddenly, we can’t screw up the world.

    The interesting thing is that Jews have done so much for the world in so many other ways. They’ve moved forward civil rights; they’ve helped save lives in Darfur, Haiti and just about everywhere else.

    But that’s not enough. Fixing the world physically is only half the battle.

    Our larger battle, the harder battle, is elevating the world spiritually. And this is what the people that fight with every inch of their soul to prove that Jews are just the same as everyone else are afraid of. It means that we can no longer just “express ourselves.” We’ll have to start thinking about the things we create and the way we act. It means we’ll have to start working together. It means we’ll have to hold one other, and ourselves, to a higher standard.

    The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country.

    Instead, we can be proud of who we are, and simultaneously aware of our huge responsibility — and opportunity.
    – Times of Israel

    I don’t think they’ll ever delete this one though

    Also read: “AS A PROUD JEW, I WANT AMERICA TO KNOW ABOUT OUR ACCOMPLISHMENT. YES, WE CONTROL HOLLYWOOD”

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • When Pharmafia plays the “nazi” card to gaslight skeptical consumers, show them Jewish media

    When Pharmafia plays the “nazi” card to gaslight skeptical consumers, show them Jewish media

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Imagine Jewish company Ben&Jerry went like: “People who don’t eat our ice-cream are anti-food and anti-semitic”. That’s exactly what Pharmafia does, amplified by their presstitutes and mass-mediots.
    But facts don’t care about fake Semites impersonating a victim while caring out a worldwide genocide.

    Btw. Times of Israel deleted its most popular post of 2012, last one in my collage, but not quite every trace of it.

    Source
    Source
    Dershowitz: Jews should never hide or excuse their disproportionate control over society

    COVID-19 Vaccines Have Jewish Links

    “AS A PROUD JEW, I WANT AMERICA TO KNOW ABOUT OUR ACCOMPLISHMENT. YES, WE CONTROL HOLLYWOOD”

    Who are the Jews behind the coronavirus vaccines?

    World’s 50 most influential Jews – The Jerusalem Post’s first annual list of those who are shaping the future.

    Argentine TV host fired over ‘Jews control the media’ tweet

    Microsoft and Google invest in medical research platform

    PULITZER-WORTHY! KLAUS SCHWAB’S NAZI ROOTS FINALLY TRACED!

    Want more? There’s tons out there.

    BONUS: 2021: Companies who gassed Jews and those who jab them hold hands, throw money at BLM & Climate-19

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Fvck vaxxers? Science says that’s probably the worst idea

    Fvck vaxxers? Science says that’s probably the worst idea

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    If you lost your virginity, it’s time to lose the ignorance too

    1. Not only DNA vaccines, but also RNA vaccines can definitively alter a vaxxer’s DNA, we showed that rescribing DNA with RNA vectors is an entire research field right now.
    2. DNA can be transmitted through sex, possibly even without procreation.
    3. Altered DNA is not the only thing that psychopaths can put in a vaxxer and you can get.

    You’re welcome.

    BONUS:

     Pfizer Report here recommending no unprotected sex and recommendations for pregnant/nursing Mothers…  https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf

    c4591001_clinical_protocol_nov2020_pfizer_biontechDownload

    10.4. Appendix 4: Contraceptive Guidance

    10.4.1. Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
    Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during
    the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which
    corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study
    intervention(s):

    • Refrain from donating sperm.

    PLUS either:
    • Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as
    their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and
    agree to remain abstinent.

    OR

    • Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for
    passage of ejaculate to another person.
    • In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be
    considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly
    effective methods below in Section 10.4.4).

    10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
    A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at
    least 1 of the following conditions applies:

    • Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3).

    OR

    • Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below
    during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.

    The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.

    later arrivals

    design-and-analysis-of-shedding-studies-for-virus-or-bacteria-based-gene-therapy-and-oncolytic-products-guidance-for-industry-1Download

    2023 CONCLUSION: Not everything is funny when it’s true, though

    Pfizer papers confirm the jabbed are shedding mRNA and they knew all along

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    ORDER
  • HEY BIG TECH, YOUR GURU ADMITS TO MEDICAL MISINFO, ARGUES HIMSELF. ARE YOU DEPLATFORMING YOURSELF?!

    HEY BIG TECH, YOUR GURU ADMITS TO MEDICAL MISINFO, ARGUES HIMSELF. ARE YOU DEPLATFORMING YOURSELF?!

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    #StopStealingOxygen

    Meet Tony “I have no evidence and I’ve just said the opposite, but I’m saying it anyway and media gonna amplify it” Fauci.
    I have a Nobel Prize and a cohort of top experts to back me up when I say he’s a fraud, I have the receipts, I have Fauci himself, what does YouTube and the Silly Valley have, besides Stalinism and a massive oxyneurodeficience?

    Is your IQ positive? 8min test: How many times did Fauci admit making shit up without any evidence?

    UPDATE:

    … AND THEN…

    AND EVEN MORE SO…

    I am proud of this one…
    … and of this one

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Why Lockdowns Are Essential to Pharmafia and their covid vaccine business

    Why Lockdowns Are Essential to Pharmafia and their covid vaccine business

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    The receipts are on the table, look closer!

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • All Covid vaccines are Made in China. The rest are gene therapies. Learn the difference

    All Covid vaccines are Made in China. The rest are gene therapies. Learn the difference

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Not a word from me, learn from experts and manufacturers. And Bill Gates.

    IF YOUTUBE TAKES DOWN THE VIDEO, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE UPLOADS ON LBRY AND BRIGHTEON

    Dr. David Martin quoted from a Weston A. Price podcast

    Obviously, I’m never recommending anything from Pharmafia ever, I’m just highlighting their BS.

    Source: BBC
    Source: BBC

    Also this:
    WHY DID MODERNA UNLIST THIS VIDEO PRESENTATION OF THEIR COVID-19 “VACCINE”?! EVERYONE NEEDS TO WATCH IT

    UPDATE:

    I unearthed a 2017 Ted Talk featuring the current Moderna boss Tal Zaks, where he describes the mRNA technology that was first meant to treat cancer, he call it “information therapy”, see for yourselves:

    Ah, and also this:

    UPDATE 2:

    DR. TENPENNY EXCELLENTLY SUMS UP THE CASE AGAINST mRNA TECHNOLOGY, SOLIDIFYING EVERYTHING WE’VE EXPOSED:

    WE’VE JUST GOT A BAN FROM YOUTUBE FOR TRYING TO MIRROR THIS VIDEO ON OUR CHANNEL, BUT THAT’S ANOTHER STORY. SO FAR IT HOLDS ON THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL, IF THEY TAKE IT DOWN, IT’S ALREADY BACKED ON OUR ODYSEE CHANNEL, SEE THE LINKS PAGE 😉

    UPDATE: ANOTHER OPEN ADMISSION: APRIL 2021

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Why did Moderna unlist this video presentation of their COVID-19 “Vaccine”?! everyone needs to watch it

    Why did Moderna unlist this video presentation of their COVID-19 “Vaccine”?! everyone needs to watch it

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    It’s published on their site though…

    Link

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • All medical authorities testify: YouTube, Facebook and Twitter spread medical misinformation, are a grave public threat

    All medical authorities testify: YouTube, Facebook and Twitter spread medical misinformation, are a grave public threat

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    The testimonies may be only implicit, but they can’t be any more solid and legit.

    Let’s play in a paradigm where we and YTFT (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter) recognize same figures as authoritative.

    What would happen if I made a video claiming no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus, like this Twit above, which is still live on many platforms?
    What if I’d be just genuinely naive (like they assume we all are) and I’d bump into this Twit without following up for updates and retractions? And then I’d spread that claim around?
    I’d go straight to internet jail, maybe even offline jail. Unlike other people.

    Don’t trust us, verify and consider the following facts:

    1. Each and every medical organization on the planet has retracted or adjusted medical information, since 2020 more than ever. Thus, they admitted the initial publications were actually wrong aka “misinformation”. It’s part and parcel of sciencing and that’s not the issue here, that’s the point: errors are scientist’s best teachers.
    2. YTFT has actively promoted this admitted misinformation, its terms and policies did nothing to stop it, proving they can’t arbiter jack shit.
    3. This misinformation has not been retracted from YouTube, persists there to this day. In fact, most of the science believed to be true today has been retracted
    4. Users who argued this misinformation have been deplatformed and their content has been erased, while the misinformation persists on all platforms.
    5. YTFT are not independent from, but massive investors in medical business.
    6. Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy that has been abhorred by most science icons ever and only denotes scientific illiteracy.

    Therefore, YTFT’s claim that they are in position to arbiter what is medical information is not only a blatant con job and misinformation, as proven by everything they do, it’s utterly insane. Anyone supporting it is accomplice in all their crimes. They can’t do better than the authorities they subject to, which have admitted to failure.
    Which makes YTFT a huge threat to the global public health and security, given their immense global reach.

    What happened to HCQ supporters on YTFT?

    Bonus: Where is risk, there has to be freedom of choice, where is risky speech there has to be freedom of choice for speech (free speech, in short).


    And if you needed me to explain such super-basic logic, you’re not intellectually equipped for survival and most likely you don’t have anymore time to catch up because the mental lazies stole the horizon from everyone. You are the virus, in fact. We’re better off if you go get a vaccine!
    If you did figure this out by yourself, in your own terms, we need you to put some daily effort into spreading the truth and making our objection more powerful, it’s the only antidote to lies. You know what you have to do, thank you!
    Ah, and also this:

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Why Censorship is Dumb AF in 21st Century – Analysis and Demonstration

    Why Censorship is Dumb AF in 21st Century – Analysis and Demonstration

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Can’t wait for to label this video below as “Censored by Youtube” and cash in on the Streissand effect, which has already given massive headaches to the Silicon Sillies, and they still haven’t learned. But that’s besides the main point below.

    ANALYSIS

    1. Censorship is a primitive moronic concept which you can’t materialize against 7+ billion people with man-power alone, you need artificial help, like AI’s
    2. Most BigTech dipshits have inherited their fortunes and merits, and are too stupid to understand AI’s aren’t really intelligent, it’s still just extreme computational power, a deep-fake of intelligence. Which is still stupid AF, despite some advantages, it’s Absent Intelligence. And the few who understand this also sell AI’s to morons like Klaus Schwab, to play their delusional megalomaniac real life Worlds of Warcraft on them. They’ve been duped same way they dupe others. Yeah, they’re great for stealing data and making models, but all AIs can be cancelled by a second of inspiration or brilliance from one living intelligence (this excludes those drones with bones that pass as people today, true).
    3. Censorship is a form of lying through forced omission. Lies are like cancer: they either devour the host and get fucked with it, or they get eliminated. So the cancer approach is primitive and dumb too. The catch is that technology actually makes it harder to hide or enforce a lie, despite the elite’s beliefs. Maintaining a technological advance can’t compensate because that illicit advance also depends on maintaining some lies, not the other way around.
      Whichever way you may look at it, censorship is self-cannibalistic and the age of censorship is not starting, it’s behind, only RTRD DPSHTS like Klaus and Biden are still clinging on it.
    When I was on the fence, censorship persuaded me that 9/11 was a hoax

    quick DEMONSTRATION that still works
    (longer, better version soon, stay tuned)

    Between Silview and Susan, she will regret her acts of censorship more, that’s already arranged

    Some argue the soundtrack is the best part of this video, I say the info is even better if you pay real attention. Either way, word is out, please help the experiment by sharing this article or the video, thanks!


    Also read: WHY CENSORSHIP DOESN’T PROTECT US FROM HATE, JUST BREEDS MORE

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • DAVOS 2021: The Great Reset is the Greatest Reject. The people have spoken

    DAVOS 2021: The Great Reset is the Greatest Reject. The people have spoken

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    At Davos 2021, the amount of inane drivel and gaslighting in technocratic language is as insane as the participants. No one should be forced to go through all that utter garbage, so I didn’t force myself too much. This is a collection of brief notes and take outs from Digital Davos 2021, that I made for myself and I’m sharing with anyone who cares.

    Davos 2021 is a fraud like everything they stand for:

    Day 1
    After deleting almost all opposition and Joe Biden’s dislikes, now Youtube deletes comments and dislikes on the WEF Channel.
    They’re getting destroyed anyway, so they are starting to close the comments. They can’t keep up with the dislikes though.


    Most crap is pre-recorded, not live.

    The Great Reset as a brand is dead, they admit it in the new presentation video. You’re welcome.
    The video is opened by the World Bank president, by the way.
    The brand is dead, but the agenda lives on, with a few adjustments.

    Just look at these fucking clowns becoming cartoons because they only sell to retards!

    Their top priority seems to be taking over cryptocurrencies now, so they’ll get that done soon. The only reliable useful information that came out from this meeting so far.

    Day 2
    ReGreta is back with the Climate-19 expertise, as Climate is their other top priority market for this year. 30 seconds into her speech and my stomach wanted out.

    Challenge! 🥋 Find positive comments on ReGreta Dumborg’s video for #Davos2021! We scrolled up to 800

    Also this horror:

    I haven’t seen them yet, but since the organization also includes Bill Gates and Bono, is safe to say this is the Coalition of the Most Hated.
    So no wonder what happened next:

    Day 3
    Today I went through the comments on Greta’s Youtube video for Davos 2021, because someone told me they gave up on moderation and there’s no positive feedback at all. False! There still are recent complains of censorship and I found 11 positive comments. Out of 770. I recorded them all on video, soon to be released. Until then…


    The stock market chaos is us too. The Twitter stock crash and this popular market insurrection changed the world forever, this is just the spark.

    Aaaand here he is, and this is what Climate-19 is all about:

    Interestingly, the only one who came out even is Putin. Even as his negative/positive comments ratio, whereas everyone else has a 7-12 negative comments for each positive ones.

    Final conclusions:

    1. Davos 2021 is an absolute disaster in terms of public image for WEF. The people have spoken unanimously, The Great Reset has been met with a Greater Reject, it has no chance to come to fruition, and the elites are literally too stupid to pull out timely. This spells total disaster for everyone, all because this bunch of psycho-dumbasses got their hands on too much power and money
    2. The elites are completely disconnected from the realities of human race, intellectually and emotionally, everything they say sounds as dictated by an artificial intelligence that has known us only from tv
    3. I tried hard to watch most of their videos so you don’t have to. I failed, it’s just utter garbage and fear porn, the few clues they give you about the future are not worth the time. They have NOTHING to offer to make their scam attractive.
    4. Watch out for their coming assault on cryptos

    I will continue to add significant information here if any, but this is the end of this story.
    Told them before they even started:
    OPEN LETTER TO THE DAVOS 2021 CARTELS: REMEMBER, REMEMBER, WE WON’T WAIT ‘TIL NOVEMBER
    #RejectTheReset

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • BREAKING! CHINA ADMITS THE BIGGEST LIE, THE WEST AND BIG TECH COMPLICIT

    BREAKING! CHINA ADMITS THE BIGGEST LIE, THE WEST AND BIG TECH COMPLICIT

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    How do I know the public discourse on Covid-19 is fully controlled and dishonest?
    Because no one important is discussing the most crucial question.

    If we’re talking a “novel virus”, which is the first logical question to ask for a microbiology ignorant like pretty much all politicians, presstitutes and big-techoles? As much as for anyone who “cares”?

    And here’s the answer for the f-ing lazy cnts

    A more extensive video with more evidence finally available HERE
    Soon on more free speech platforms. Unfortunately, we can only embed Youtube videos here.

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

  • Open Letter to the Davos 2021 Cartels: Remember, Remember, We Won’t Wait ‘Til November

    Open Letter to the Davos 2021 Cartels: Remember, Remember, We Won’t Wait ‘Til November

    by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

    Digital Davos 2021, the World Economic Forum annual reunion is about to start in a few hours. Online, because they don’t have the guts to gather in person after they’ve just crashed the world on our backs.

    If you get what I did here, please spread it, maybe it reaches some oligarchs and helps them feel something. Words are an approximate quote from some WEF auxiliary personnel, forgot her name.
    #GreaterReset #RejectTheReset #TheGreatAwakening

    PS: You can’t trust the judgement on anyone who dresses like this for an official event.

    CLICK HERE TO SHARE THIS MEME

    PPS:
    I went through the comments on Greta’s Youtube video for Davos 2021, because someone told me there’s no positive feedback at all. I found 11 positive comments. Out of 770.
    The stock market chaos is us too.
    This is just the spark.
    How many timed did I tell you…?

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them